Triple Analysis: Lung Cancer, Lymphoma and Cancer Vaccines

This triple analysis focuses on cancer drug development strategies in both Lung Cancer and Lymphoma and by the mechanism/target/effect of Cancer Vaccines. Each of these three individual parts is evaluated according to standardized criteria in a five pillar pipeline drug assessment methodology to compare drug development strategies in oncology. This makes it easy to find and compare analysis not only within one single cancer focus area but also between different areas.

Below is a short synopsis of each part included in this report:

Part I: Lung Cancer
The lung cancer report part comprises defined and up to date development strategies for 416 lung cancer drugs within the portfolio of 218 investigators, from Ceased to Marketed. This part extensively analyses their 241 identified drug targets, organized into 237 drug target strategies, and assesses them in eight different compound strategies and and three subindications of lung cancer.
This part is based on the following publication:
Lung Cancer: A Decision Support Tool for Optimizing the Pipeline from Research To Market

Part II: Lymphoma
The lymphoma report part comprises defined and up to date development strategies for 282 lymphoma drugs within the portfolio of 154 investigators, from Ceased to Marketed. This part extensively analyses their 181 identified drug targets, organized into 173 drug target strategies, and assesses them in eight different compound strategies and and five subindications of lymphoma.
This part is based on the following publication:
A Decision Support Tool for Optimizing The Lymphoma Pipeline: From Research and Development to Market

Part III: Cancer Vaccines
The cancer vaccine report part comprises defined and up to date development strategies for 155 cancer vaccine drugs within the portfolio of 99 investigators, from Ceased to Marketed. This part extensively analyses their 94 identified drug targets, organized into 91 drug target strategies, and assesses them in 42 different cancer indications.
This part is based on the following publication:
Commercializing Cancer Vaccines: A Decision Support Tool for Optimizing the Pipeline

The report is written for you to understand and assess the impact of competitor entry and corresponding changes to development strategies for your own portfolio products. It helps teams to maximize molecule value by selecting optimal development plans and manage risk and uncertainty. The report serves as an external commercial advocate for pharmaceutical companies’ pipeline and portfolio planning (PPP) in cancer by:

* Providing you with competitive input to the R&D organization to guide development of early product ideas and ensure efforts are aligned with business objectives

* Assisting you to make informed decisions in selecting cancer indications that are known to be appropriate for your drug’s properties

* Analyzing, correlating and integrating valuable data sources in order to provide accurate data for valuation of pipeline, in-licensing and new business opportunities

* Providing you with commercial analytic support for due diligence on in-licensing and acquisition opportunities

* Supporting development of integrative molecule, pathway and disease area strategies

* Integrating knowledge for you to consider the therapeutic target for the highest therapeutic outcome and return on investment

This report provides systems, analytical and strategic support both internally to PPP and to stakeholders across your own organization. The report will also be an important part of creating and implementing a market development plan for cancer drugs to insure that the optimal market conditions exist by the time the products are commercialized.